Serveur d'exploration sur l'opéra

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

MODERN SOVEREIGNTY IN QUESTION: THEOLOGY, DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM

Identifieur interne : 000E74 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000E73; suivant : 000E75

MODERN SOVEREIGNTY IN QUESTION: THEOLOGY, DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM

Auteurs : Adrian Pabst [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:CE3394C7D3369888B6346A2FEE8F5E69056B2A59

Abstract

This essay argues that modern sovereignty is not simply a legal or political concept that is coterminous with the modern nation‐state. Rather, at the theoretical level modern sovereign power is inscribed into a wider theological dialectic between “the one” and “the many”. Modernity fuses juridical‐constitutional models of supreme state authority with a new, “biopolitical” account of power whereby natural life and the living body of the individual are the object of politics and are subject to state control (section 1). The origins of this dialectic go back to changes within Christian theology in the late Middle Ages and the early modern period. In particular, these changes can be traced to Ockham's denial of the universal Good in things, Suárez's priority of the political community over the ecclesial body and Hobbes's “biopolitical” definition of power as state dominion over life (section 2). At the practical level, modern sovereignty has involved both the national state and the transnational market. The “revolutions in sovereignty” that gave rise to the modern state and the modern market were to some considerable extent shaped by theological concepts and changes in religious institutions and practices: first, the supremacy of the modern national state over the transnational papacy and national churches; second, the increasing priority of individuality over collectivity; third, a growing focus on contractual proprietary relations at the expense of covenantal ties and communal bonds (section 3). By subjecting both people and property to uniform standards of formal natural rights and abstract monetary value, financial capitalism and liberal secular democracy are part of the “biopolitical” logic that subordinates the sanctity of life and land to the secular sacrality of the state and the market. In Pope Benedict's theology, we can find the contours of a post‐secular political economy that challenges the monopoly of modern sovereignty (sections 4–5).

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0025.2010.01633.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">MODERN SOVEREIGNTY IN QUESTION: THEOLOGY, DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pabst, Adrian" sort="Pabst, Adrian" uniqKey="Pabst A" first="Adrian" last="Pabst">Adrian Pabst</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:CE3394C7D3369888B6346A2FEE8F5E69056B2A59</idno>
<date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-0025.2010.01633.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/CE3394C7D3369888B6346A2FEE8F5E69056B2A59/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000A44</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000A44</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000246</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0266-7177:2010:Pabst A:modern:sovereignty:in</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000E84</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000E74</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000E74</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">MODERN SOVEREIGNTY IN QUESTION: THEOLOGY, DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pabst, Adrian" sort="Pabst, Adrian" uniqKey="Pabst A" first="Adrian" last="Pabst">Adrian Pabst</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Kent, Politics and International Relations, Rutherford College Canterbury, CT2 7NX</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>CT2 7NX</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Modern Theology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0266-7177</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-0025</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2010-10">2010-10</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">26</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="570">570</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="602">602</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0266-7177</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">CE3394C7D3369888B6346A2FEE8F5E69056B2A59</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-0025.2010.01633.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">MOTH1633</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0266-7177</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This essay argues that modern sovereignty is not simply a legal or political concept that is coterminous with the modern nation‐state. Rather, at the theoretical level modern sovereign power is inscribed into a wider theological dialectic between “the one” and “the many”. Modernity fuses juridical‐constitutional models of supreme state authority with a new, “biopolitical” account of power whereby natural life and the living body of the individual are the object of politics and are subject to state control (section 1). The origins of this dialectic go back to changes within Christian theology in the late Middle Ages and the early modern period. In particular, these changes can be traced to Ockham's denial of the universal Good in things, Suárez's priority of the political community over the ecclesial body and Hobbes's “biopolitical” definition of power as state dominion over life (section 2). At the practical level, modern sovereignty has involved both the national state and the transnational market. The “revolutions in sovereignty” that gave rise to the modern state and the modern market were to some considerable extent shaped by theological concepts and changes in religious institutions and practices: first, the supremacy of the modern national state over the transnational papacy and national churches; second, the increasing priority of individuality over collectivity; third, a growing focus on contractual proprietary relations at the expense of covenantal ties and communal bonds (section 3). By subjecting both people and property to uniform standards of formal natural rights and abstract monetary value, financial capitalism and liberal secular democracy are part of the “biopolitical” logic that subordinates the sanctity of life and land to the secular sacrality of the state and the market. In Pope Benedict's theology, we can find the contours of a post‐secular political economy that challenges the monopoly of modern sovereignty (sections 4–5).</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Pabst, Adrian" sort="Pabst, Adrian" uniqKey="Pabst A" first="Adrian" last="Pabst">Adrian Pabst</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/OperaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E74 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000E74 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    OperaV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:CE3394C7D3369888B6346A2FEE8F5E69056B2A59
   |texte=   MODERN SOVEREIGNTY IN QUESTION: THEOLOGY, DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21.
Data generation: Thu Apr 14 14:59:05 2016. Site generation: Thu Jan 4 23:09:23 2024